All (110)Personal Introduction (1)AI Summary (8)Project Management (4)Investment Strategy (9)Financial Market Analysis (6)AI Software Engineering (9)AI Research (7)Content Management (9)Cognitive Development (1)Philosophical Reflection (3)Entrepreneurship (1)AI Tools Development (9)Product Development (3)Troubleshooting (2)Quantitative Finance (12)AI Cost Analysis (1)System Architecture (1)Simulation Framework (1)Technical Log (3)AI Social Systems (3)Personal Reflection (1)
Trickle Fund
Investment Strategy
👤 Readers interested in fund design, financial product naming, or investment concepts, particularly those focused on innovative financial models.
This article explores the process of naming the fund, from the initial idea of 'Persistence War Fund' to the final determination as 'Trickle Fund'. The author explains in detail the water-electricity pun meaning of the word 'trickle': the water aspect represents a small but continuous cash flow pattern, while the electricity aspect refers to trickle charging technology, aligning with the fund's design where investors authorize constant cash flow, the fund outputs cash flow after profit-taking, and pre-charged balances earn current returns in a charge-discharge cycle system. The article emphasizes that a good name should be concise, memorable, and withstand explanation, and points out that 'Trickle' in English also has intuitive meanings such as 'trickle-down effect' and 'flowing slowly'.
- ✨ The fund was ultimately named 'Trickle Fund', replacing the initial idea of 'Persistence War Fund'.
- ✨ The word 'trickle' has a water-electricity pun meaning: water represents small but continuous cash flow, while electricity refers to trickle charging technology, aligning with the fund's charge-discharge cycle design.
- ✨ 'Trickle' in English has rich meanings, including the trickle-down effect and flowing slowly, making the name concise, memorable, and able to withstand explanation.
📅 2026-02-13 · 308 words · ~2 min read
Responses Before the Capital Persistence War Live Trading
Investment Strategy
👤 Investors and readers interested in high-yield investment strategies, risk management, and Crypto trading
This article is the author's response to doubts before the Capital Persistence War live trading. Regarding the excessively high yield issue, the author explains that high returns stem from taking on predictable high risks and distinguishes between yield calculations based on cash flow versus total assets. Concerning tail risks, the author emphasizes prevention through zero-debt guarantees and exchange liquidation mechanisms, using the Crypto market as an example to illustrate their effectiveness. For article focus, the author acknowledges the fragmented nature of logs and promises to improve readability through AI summaries. The core viewpoint is that the Capital Persistence War strategy pursues high returns, high risks, and high capacity, with key aspects being risk expectation management and technical risk control.
- ✨ High yield rates stem from taking on predictable high risks, with yield calculations based on cash flow rather than total assets
- ✨ Tail risks are prevented through zero-debt guarantees and exchange liquidation mechanisms, validated as effective in the Crypto market
- ✨ The Capital Persistence War strategy aims to balance high returns, high risks, and high capacity
- ✨ Article focus will be improved through AI summaries to facilitate reader follow-ups
📅 2026-02-12 · 1,277 words · ~6 min read
Design Guidelines for Fund Structures in Capital Endurance Strategies
Investment Strategy
👤 Fund investors, fund managers, financial innovation researchers
This article proposes an innovative fund design model, where investors authorize a fixed cash flow rate (e.g., $1/day) instead of making a lump-sum capital investment. The fund determines position sizes and profit distribution based on this authorized cash flow to ensure fairness. The model eliminates traditional management fees and performance fees, with managers earning profits through relaxed profit-taking multiples to avoid conflicts of interest. Additionally, it removes high-water marks to simplify return processes and plans to integrate with Expert Advisors (EAs) to achieve a closed-loop investment system and enhance capital efficiency.
- ✨ Investors authorize a fixed cash flow rate to determine position sizes and profit distribution
- ✨ Eliminates management fees and performance fees, with managers earning profits through relaxed profit-taking multiples
- ✨ Removes high-water marks to simplify return processes
- ✨ Plans to integrate with Expert Advisors (EAs) for automated management and capital efficiency optimization
📅 2026-02-12 · 815 words · ~4 min read
Capital Protracted War: A Strategic Framework for Individual Investors to Transcend Class
Investment Strategy
👤 Individual investors, especially those seeking to transcend class, interested in programmatic trading and risk control, and new readers.
This article systematically elaborates on the 'Capital Protracted War' investment strategic framework proposed by zccz14 in 2026. Drawing wisdom from Mao Zedong's 'On Protracted War' and combining it with the anti-Martingale capital management strategy, it proposes the core proposition: 'Use losses you can afford to gamble for returns you 'cannot afford'.' Through four principles—controllable losses, advantage accumulation, pressing the advantage, and clear objectives—it refutes theories of inevitable individual failure, all-in for quick riches, and steady development. It aims to achieve exponential growth of personal capital, ultimately allowing investors to 'exit the market after victory.' The article details its mathematical formalization framework, key concept extensions (such as the 'power generation/consumption' framework), experimental validation systems (including synthetic data and real data validation with BTC and ETH), and looks forward to future directions like community-based trading. As of February 2026, the theory has completed experimental validation and is preparing to enter live trading.
- ✨ Core proposition: Use controllable losses to pursue high returns, achieve exponential growth, and ultimately exit the market.
- ✨ Four principles: Controllable losses, advantage accumulation, pressing the advantage, and clear objectives.
- ✨ Mathematical framework: Based on risk control lines, dual-account systems, and anti-Martingale position calculations.
- ✨ Experimental validation: Shows strategy effectiveness in synthetic data and real BTC/ETH data.
- ✨ Key concepts: Such as the 'power generation/consumption' framework, position sizing based on losses, and essential differences from the Martingale strategy.
📅 2026-02-11 · 4,494 words · ~20 min read
Capital Endurance War: Reiteration and Discussion of Investment Philosophy
Investment Strategy
👤 Individual investors, fund managers, professionals interested in exponential growth investment strategies
Based on discussions from a business seminar on January 29, 2026, this article first reviews the losses of the Midas strategy on HYPE tokens, analyzing market characteristics and strategy limitations. The core section reiterates the investment philosophy of Capital Endurance War, proposing a clear distinction between positive cash flow (power generation) and negative cash flow (power consumption) investment intentions, emphasizing the importance of matching tools with purposes. The article critiques the linear thinking of traditional investments that pursue stable annualized returns, advocating for achieving exponential capital growth through continuous cash inflows and dynamic position management under clear risk control lines. Finally, the article addresses common questions, clarifies the differences between Capital Endurance War and strategies like Martingale or fixed-ratio investing, and notes that its core is goal-oriented rather than tied to specific strategies.
- ✨ Midas strategy losses stem from small-cap token characteristics and regression strategy limitations
- ✨ Investments should distinguish between positive cash flow (power generation) and negative cash flow (power consumption) intentions
- ✨ Tool design should focus on a single purpose, allowing investors to freely combine generators and consumers
- ✨ Traditional investments pursue stable annualized returns, while Capital Endurance War aims for exponential growth
- ✨ The Capital Endurance War framework includes clear risk boundaries, continuous cash inflows, dynamic position management, and redefined victory conditions
📅 2026-01-30 · 2,958 words · ~14 min read
Wealth Choices in 'Qi Pa Shuo': Steady Growth vs. Class Leap
Investment Strategy
👤 Ordinary investors, financial enthusiasts, young people interested in wealth accumulation strategies, midlife crisis groups, financial beginners
This article adopts an AI-generated 'Qi Pa Shuo' debate format, centered on the topic: 'Should ordinary people choose steady growth or a class leap?' The affirmative side (steady growth faction) emphasizes time compounding, psychological stability, and certainty, arguing that steadiness is the only solution for ordinary people; the negative side (class leap faction) advocates a capital protracted war framework, seeking breakthroughs through controlled losses and programmatic trading, believing the digital age requires proactive change. The debate covers multiple perspectives including data statistics, psychology, economics, and technological impact, with a final audience vote showing 52% support for class leap. The article summarizes the pros and cons of the two core frameworks, provides practical guidance, and emphasizes that investment should be tailored to one's capacity and continuous learning.
- ✨ The steady growth faction emphasizes time compounding, asset allocation, and long-term holding, suitable for risk-averse individuals
- ✨ The class leap faction advocates a capital protracted war framework, including controlled losses, programmatic trading, and profit-taking with added positions
- ✨ The debate involves multi-dimensional analysis from data statistics, psychology, economics, and technological perspectives
- ✨ Audience vote result: 52% support class leap, 48% support steady growth
- ✨ The article provides practical guidance, including steady dollar-cost averaging, capital protracted war execution, and hybrid strategies
📅 2026-01-24 · 3,487 words · ~16 min read
Capital Endurance War: Strategic Practice Guide for Individual Investors
Investment Strategy
👤 Individual investors, people interested in investment strategies and practices, AI tool users
This article is a practical guide on the Capital Endurance War strategy, where the author abandons academic packaging and advocates for plain language explanation. The core idea is that the fundamental purpose of Capital Endurance War is to allow individual investors to leave the market after victory, not to pursue stable profits. The article discusses the difference between this strategy and lotteries, pointing out that the market is a game of strategy rather than a pure probability game; it addresses whether the strategy would still be profitable if everyone adopted it, emphasizing that differences in underlying strategies can avoid crowding; and mentions counterarguments to collective action problems. The author also plans to validate the strategy through backtesting and shares interactions with the AI tool OpenCode, deciding to build an adversarial generative Agents framework.
- ✨ The fundamental purpose of Capital Endurance War is to allow individual investors to leave the market after victory, not to pursue stable profits.
- ✨ The market is a game of strategy disguised as a probability game, where investors can increase their win rate through strategies.
- ✨ Capital Endurance War does not assume a uniform underlying strategy; differences can avoid collective action problems and crowding effects.
- ✨ Plans to validate the strategy through backtesting, focusing on T_S performance and failure thresholds.
- ✨ The author interacted with the AI tool OpenCode and decided to build an adversarial generative Agents framework.
📅 2026-01-21 · 846 words · ~4 min read
Capital Protracted War: A Strategy for Individual Investors to Transcend Social Classes
Investment Strategy
👤 Individual investors seeking leapfrog wealth growth, especially those dissatisfied with traditional investment methods and willing to embrace new strategies.
This article critiques three mainstream investment views: the inevitability of individual failure, the all-in gamble for quick riches, and steady development theory. It proposes 'Capital Protracted War' as a fourth approach for individual investors to transcend social classes. The core idea is to use minimal acceptable risk to pursue victory-level high returns, achieving leapfrog wealth growth by controlling loss rates, accumulating advantages through programmatic trading, and adding positions with floating profits to press the advantage. The article emphasizes the need for stable cash flow, using programmatic trading to avoid emotional decisions, and accepting the possibility of failure, with the ultimate goal of achieving exponential wealth growth under controllable losses.
- ✨ Using controllable losses to pursue extremely high returns is key to transcending social classes
- ✨ Refutes three erroneous views: the inevitability of individual failure, the all-in gamble for quick riches, and steady development theory
- ✨ Must prepare stable cash flow to control maximum loss rates
- ✨ Use programmatic trading to avoid emotional decisions and accumulate advantages
- ✨ Immediately add positions with floating profits when profitable to press the advantage
📅 2026-01-17 · 5,429 words · ~24 min read
Work Log: Reflections and Practice on the Floating Profit Pyramid Strategy
Investment Strategy
👤 Traders and investors interested in capital management and trading strategies, as well as individuals focused on work logs and AI applications.
This article is a work log documenting the author's daily work and reflections while under the weather. The core content revolves around the 'floating profit pyramid' capital management strategy: the author draws wisdom from reading 'On Protracted War' to plan related articles; recalls that the strategy's inception stemmed from thoughts on futures trading stories years ago, and recently systematized it when pondering how to earn 20 million in a year; further validates its potential through a case shared by Mage (an All-in strategy from $12 to $100,000 using floating profits). The author believes that implementing the floating profit pyramid during periods of volatility clustering in market trading may achieve rapid capital growth. The log also mentions writing purposes including recording work insights, preparing for AI training, and future project planning, and thanks team support for enabling focused thinking.
- ✨ Floating profit pyramid is a promising capital management strategy, originating from the author's thoughts years ago and now systematized.
- ✨ Effectiveness of the strategy is supported by historical cases (e.g., 'On Protracted War') and real-world examples (e.g., All-in strategy from $12 to $100,000).
- ✨ The author believes that floating profit pyramid may achieve rapid capital growth during periods of market volatility clustering.
- ✨ The work log serves to record reflections, prepare for AI training, and plan future projects.
- ✨ Team support enables the author to focus on strategy research and macro planning.
📅 2026-01-17 · 488 words · ~3 min read